Today 10:35 am
NATO was formed distinctly because of feared Soviet expansion.Cannonpointer » Today, 1:22 am » wrote: ↑ Which part of that argument is false? It might have been clunky, but it isn't false in its meaning.
It is a fact that NATO's artical 5 is about assiting in the defense of a member state which is a victim of aggression, and the language unmistakably affirms that alliance members are under no obligation to assist an aggressor who is being answered with violence.
Her simplistic assessment is beyond "clunky".
The impetus behind why there are ANY articles at all (read: reason for NATO's existence) was Soviet Empire.
I stand by what I said.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.